by Carmen Van Kerckhove
Last week, a friend of mine posted this Associated Press article on my Facebook wall.
I was struck by the fact that the article included several different definitions of “racism,” but not a single one bore any resemblance to the way most anti-racists would define it.
In other words, the article promotes the notion that racism is about personal prejudice, or a belief in the superiority of one race over another, but doesn’t at all cover the systemic or institutional nature of racism.
I believe that one of the reasons anti-racism hasn’t taken off the way we’d like it to, has to do with this very issue of terminology. How can anti-racists and laypeople talk to each other about race when they have completely different ideas of what “racism” is supposed to be? No wonder people roll their eyes when they hear things like “people of color can’t be racist.” If you don’t know the anti-racist definition of racism, that statement makes absolutely no sense.
Some of my fellow anti-racist activists and bloggers would argue that it’s up to the general public to educate themselves on Racism 101, and that we can’t be responsible for people’s wilful ignorance.
But if you don’t even realize you’re missing knowledge in this area, how are you supposed to seek to learn it? And even if you are sufficiently motivated to go out and educate yourself, many race-related resources out there just aren’t that user-friendly.
(Even Dr. Beverly Tatum’s classic Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? — arguably one of the most accessible books out there on race — takes nearly a whole chapter to define what “racism” is.)
Again, I have a few colleagues who’d say: “Oh cry me a river. So you have to wade through a few dense, academic texts. What’s that compared to the oppression that people of color have faced for centuries?”
Well, of course there’s no comparison. But if we really want to create change when it comes to race, why not make it easier for people to learn? I see nothing wrong with trying to make the topic more accessible, and even to some degree, entertaining.
I’m glad to see that many of you, judging from your responses to my recent book survey, feel the same way. No matter what kind of book I end up writing, you can be sure that it will contain plenty of humor, pop culture references, and personal anecdotes.
On a side note, I’m not convinced that it’s even possible for us to take the anti-racist definition of “racism” mainstream. It seems to me that the idea of racism as personal prejudice is too firmly entrenched in popular language already. Maybe it’s time to create a new word to describe the idea of a system of advantage based on race?